Skip to content
GERICLINICS

GeriQBank · Paper III · Q6

Balance and gait assessment

High YieldAsked ×27-mark note
Chapter
Falls, Gait, Syncope & Dizziness
Years asked
Not recorded in the source
Frequency
Set 2× in Paper III (2009–2025)

As set in the university paper

  • Gait and balance assessment.

    Paper III · Falls, Gait, Balance & Dizziness · asked ×2 · 7-mark note · see in paper list

Answer framework

  1. Definitions and physiology — balance and its sensory inputs; gait; why gait assessment matters
  2. Balance tools — 30-second chair stand, SPPB, 4-stage balance test, Berg Balance Scale, functional reach
  3. Gait tools — gait speed, Get Up and Go / TUG, Tinetti POMA, Kane's performance-based assessment, dual-task testing
  4. Age-related and disease-specific findings — normal ageing changes; responses to perturbation; Parkinsonian, stroke, cerebellar and vestibular gaits
  5. Place in practice — CDC STEADI
  6. Recent updates — World Falls Guidelines, gait speed in sarcopenia, WHO ICOPE chair rise, dual-task testing and MCR, instrumented gait analysis

An exam answer plan drawn from the detailed answer below. Use it to attempt the question first.

Detailed answer

Pro · free in beta
Attempt it firstOutline your answer as a 7-mark note before revealing it — definition, causes, evaluation, management and the geriatric angle.Reveal answer

Short revision answer

  • Balance keeps the centre of mass within the base of support with minimal sway. It integrates proprioception, vestibular and visual input, central coordination and neuromuscular responses. On a firm, level surface proprioception dominates; on uneven or moving ground vestibular input becomes essential.
  • Gait assessment is core to CGA: at least one-fifth of community-dwelling older adults report difficulty walking, rising to half of those aged 85 and above.
  • Balance tools: the 30-second chair stand (balance and strength; part of the SPPB); the 4-stage balance test (hold each position for 10 seconds); the Berg Balance Scale (14 items, 0–56: 0–20 wheelchair-bound, 21–40 walks with assistance, 41–56 independent); functional reach (<10 inches suggests fall risk).
  • Gait speed over 4 metres is the simplest global measure: below 0.6 m/s is abnormal and 0.6–0.8 m/s is high risk.
  • Get Up and Go / TUG: inpatient sensitivity 91% but specificity only 22%; Kane recommends it for everyone who has fallen. Tinetti POMA: balance 16 + gait 12 = 28; below 19 is high risk and 19–24 at risk; it takes 10–15 minutes.
  • Kane's performance-based assessment (sitting and standing balance, rising, Romberg, sternal nudge, walking, turning, neck turning, back extension) finds more remediable problems than a standard neuromuscular examination. Dual-task testing is of unclear utility.
  • Normal ageing: slower gait (12–16% per decade), shorter steps, longer double-limb support and more sway. Disease gaits: Parkinson's (freezing, helped by visual cues), stroke (reduced swing-phase flexion), cerebellar (broad-based ataxia) and vestibular (veering to the side of the lesion with eyes closed).
  • CDC STEADI uses the TUG, the 30-second chair stand and the 4-stage balance test.
  • Updates: World Falls Guidelines 2022 use gait and balance impairment to separate intermediate from low risk. Gait speed defines sarcopenia (≤0.8 m/s in EWGSOP2; <1.0 m/s in AWGS 2019, the cut-off to use in Indians). WHO ICOPE 2025 uses the chair rise as its locomotor screen. Motoric Cognitive Risk syndrome (slow gait plus a cognitive complaint) predicts dementia and falls. Wearable sensors have not yet replaced clinical tests.

Condensed by GeriClinics from the detailed answer below, with no new facts added.

15–20 High-Yield Points (Textbook)

A. Definitions and Physiology

1.

Balance (equilibrium) is the ability to maintain the centre of mass of the body within the base of support with minimal postural sway.

2.

Balance depends on the integration of proprioception, vestibular input, visual input, central coordination and neuromuscular responses.

3.

When standing, changes in orientation are first perceived by cutaneous proprioceptive sensors in the feet; the vestibular apparatus detects linear and angular acceleration of the head; vision detects motion of the visual field. On a fixed level surface proprioception predominates; when the surface is irregular or moving, vestibular input becomes essential.

4.

Gait is the pattern of trunk and limb movement during locomotion over a solid surface — the “manner of walking” or “sequence of foot movements”.

5.

Gait assessment is a critical part of the comprehensive geriatric assessment. At least one-fifth of community-dwelling older adults report difficulty walking, rising to one-half in those aged 85 and above.

B. Tools for Assessing Balance

6.

30-second chair stand — number of chair stands completed in 30 seconds with arms crossed on the chest. The most practical tool in a busy clinic; measures both balance and strength. It is one component of the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB).

7.

Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) — repeated chair stands plus balance testing with side-by-side, semitandem and tandem stands, plus gait speed.

8.

4-Stage Balance Test — side-by-side, semitandem, tandem and one-foot stand. Normal balance = holding each position for 10 seconds.

9.

Berg Balance Scale — a 14-item test of everyday tasks (sitting unsupported, sit-to-stand, stand-to-sit, transfers, standing unsupported, eyes closed, feet together, tandem standing, one-leg stand, turning the trunk, retrieving objects from the floor, turning 360 degrees, stool stepping, reaching forward). Total score 0–56. Interpretation: 0–20 wheelchair bound, 21–40 walks with assistance, 41–56 independent. Validated originally in older stroke patients; predicts functional and motor performance and future falls.

10.

Functional reach test — dynamic standing balance. The subject stands behind a line and reaches the arm as far forward as possible without stepping. Fall risk is suspected if reach is less than 10 inches. It correlates with other balance measures and predicts future decline in ADLs, though it may not reliably predict falls.

C. Tools for Assessing Gait

11.

Gait speed is the simplest and most standardised global measure of health and function. Measured over a pre-measured 4 metre distance. 0.6–0.8 m/sec identifies a high-risk population and 0.6 m/sec is the generally accepted cut-off for abnormal gait speed.

12.

Get Up and Go Test (GUGT) / Timed Up and Go (TUGT) — rise from a chair, walk a set distance, turn, walk back and sit down. In the inpatient setting sensitivity is 91% but specificity only 22%. Even an untimed GUGT is clinically useful for identifying specific balance and gait problems. Kane recommends a simple “get up and go” test in all patients who have fallen.

13.

Tinetti’s Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA) — 14 performance tasks split into balance and gait. Maximum balance score 16, maximum gait score 12, total 28. Score below 19 = high risk of falls; 19–24 = at risk. Mean sensitivity 82%, specificity 65%. Takes 10–15 minutes, so it is harder to use in a busy clinic. Interrater agreement is over 85%.

14.

The Tinetti balance items are: sitting balance, arises, attempts to arise, immediate standing balance (first 5 seconds), standing balance, nudged, eyes closed, turning 360 degrees, sitting down. The gait items are: initiation of gait, step length and height, step symmetry, step continuity, path, trunk, and walking stance.

15.

Kane’s performance-based assessment grades each manoeuvre as normal, adaptive or abnormal: sitting balance, arising from chair, immediate standing balance (first 3–5 seconds), standing balance, Romberg, sternal nudge (examiner pushes with light even pressure over the sternum three times), walking, turning balance through 360 degrees, neck turning, and back extension. This is more useful than the standard neuromuscular examination for identifying remediable problems.

16.

Dual-task testing — walking while counting backwards from 100 by sevens, GUGT while holding a full glass of water, or one-leg stand with eyes closed. Institutionalised older adults who cannot keep up a conversation while walking have a high risk of falls. Both young and old prioritise gait over the secondary cognitive task. Clinical utility is still unclear because of variability across studies.

D. Age-Related Findings to Look For

17.

Expect slower gait, reduced step length, increased time in double limb support, reduced range of motion, and increased anterior-posterior postural sway. Gait speed falls 12–16% per decade.

18.

On perturbation testing, younger people abduct the arms uphill and hinge at hips and trunk to keep the centre of mass away from the tilt; older subjects have reduced compensatory trunk movement and stretch the arms in the direction of the fall.

19.

Recognise disease-specific gaits: Parkinson’s disease — gait initiation failure and freezing, better with external visual cues; post-stroke — decreased hip and knee flexion during the swing phase; cerebellar disease — broad-based ataxic gait; vestibular lesion — veering to the ipsilateral side when walking with eyes closed.

20.

Where to place it in practice: gait, strength and balance assessment forms the core of the CDC STEADI risk assessment using TUGT, 30-second chair stand and 4-stage balance test.

Latest Updates (2023–Present)

World Falls Guidelines 2022 retain gait and balance assessment as the core of risk stratification and specifically recommend timed up and go, gait speed, and a balance test such as the 4-stage or Berg scale. Crucially, the guidelines position gait and balance impairment as the factor that separates intermediate from low risk in a person with a single fall.

Gait speed is now used as a vital sign and as a core criterion for sarcopenia in EWGSOP2 (≤0.8 m/s) and AWGS 2019 (<1.0 m/s for Asians — the more appropriate cut-off for Indian patients) and for frailty in the Fried phenotype. WHO ICOPE (2nd edition, 2025) uses the chair rise test as the primary screening item for the locomotor capacity domain in integrated care for older people, making it the most relevant tool for Indian primary and community-level screening under NPHCE.

Dual-task gait assessment and gait variability (stride time variability) are increasingly validated as markers of cognitive-motor risk. The Motoric Cognitive Risk (MCR) syndrome — slow gait plus subjective cognitive complaint without dementia — predicts incident dementia and falls, and can be diagnosed without any neuropsychological testing. Instrumented and digital gait assessment using wearable inertial sensors and smartphone applications gives spatiotemporal parameters (variability, asymmetry, turning) with better fall prediction than stopwatch measures; these are still research or specialist tools, and guidelines caution that no instrumented tool has yet replaced clinical assessment.

Current Practice Update

Issue Textbook position Current position

Gait speed cut-off 0.6 m/s abnormal; 0.6–0.8 m/s high risk Retained for falls, but ≤0.8 m/s (EWGSOP2) and <1.0 m/s (AWGS 2019, Asian) are used for sarcopenia — use the AWGS cut-off in Indian patients Screening tool of choice STEADI trio: TUGT, 30-s chair stand, 4-stage Same trio endorsed; WHO ICOPE 2025 uses the balance chair rise test as the single locomotor screen for community settings Dual tasking Proposed screen, clinical utility unclear Now linked to Motoric Cognitive Risk syndrome and used as a cognitive-motor risk marker Technology Not addressed Wearable inertial sensors / smartphone gait analysis improve prediction but do not yet replace clinical tests Exam One-Liners Balance = keeping centre of mass within base of support with minimal sway.

Fixed level surface → proprioception dominant; uneven or moving surface → vestibular dominant. Berg Balance Scale: 14 items, 0–56; ≤20 wheelchair, 21–40 assisted, 41–56 independent. Functional reach <10 inches = fall risk.

4-stage balance test: hold each position 10 seconds.

Gait speed over 4 m; abnormal <0.6 m/s (use <1.0 m/s AWGS for Asian sarcopenia). Tinetti POMA: balance 16 + gait 12 = 28; <19 high risk, 19–24 at risk.

TUGT: sensitivity 91%, specificity 22% in inpatients.

How was your recall?

Rating marks the question complete. “Need another pass” also adds it to your bookmarks.

References

Spotted an error or something out of date?Report a problem with this page