GeriQBank · Paper III · Q10
Hodgkin Lymphoma
- Chapter
- Haematology
- Years asked
- Not recorded in the source
- Frequency
- Set 1× in Paper III (2009–2025)
As set in the university paper
What are the types of Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma? What are their clinical presentations and prognosis, and what are the principles of therapy?
Paper III · Haematology & Oncology · asked ×1 · 7-mark note · see in paper list
Detailed answer
Pro · free in betaAttempt it firstOutline your answer as a 7-mark note before revealing it — definition, causes, evaluation, management and the geriatric angle.Reveal answer
Textbook gap: No Hodgkin lymphoma chapter. Only link: Ch. 26 — actuarial risk of therapy-related MDS/AML is 6–9% after Hodgkin's treatment (vs 17% after myeloma treatment). Geriatric-oncology philosophy from Ch. 26/27 transfers directly.
High-Yield Points
A. Definition & Epidemiology
B-cell derived lymphoid malignancy; malignant cells only 1–2% of tumour mass, surrounded by reactive infiltrate.
Bimodal age distribution — peaks at 15–35 and after 55–60 years; 20–25% of cases occur >60 years.
Elderly HL behaves worse: more advanced stage, more B symptoms, more mixed-cellularity, higher EBV positivity. 5-yr survival falls from >90% (young) to 40–60% (>60).
B. Classification (WHO-HAEM5)
Subtype Frequency Features
Nodular sclerosis ~70% Young adults, mediastinal mass Mixed cellularity 20–25% Older patients, HIV, EBV+ Lymphocyte-depleted <1% Worst prognosis — elderly, HIV, EBV+
Immunophenotype: classic RS cells — CD30+, CD15+, CD45−, CD20 weak/neg. NLPHL "popcorn" cells — CD20+, CD45+, CD30−, CD15− (mirror image).
9p24.1 amplification → PD-L1/PD-L2 overexpression — basis for checkpoint inhibitor efficacy.
C. Clinical Features
Painless, rubbery cervical/supraclavicular lymphadenopathy ± mediastinal mass.
Spreads contiguously node-group to node-group (unlike NHL's unpredictable spread).
B symptoms (fever >38°C, night sweats, weight loss >10%) in 25–30%, more frequent in elderly.
D. Diagnosis & Staging
Excisional lymph node biopsy mandatory — FNA inadequate.
Staging: PET-CT, Lugano/Ann Arbor (I–IV, A/B suffix); bone marrow biopsy usually omitted.
IPS score (advanced disease): albumin <4 g/dL, Hb <10.5 g/dL, male, age ≥45, stage IV, WCC ≥15,000, lymphocytes <600/µL.
Management
Setting Approach
Early favourable 2 cycles ABVD + 20 Gy involved-site RT, or PET-adapted chemo alone Advanced, fit Nivolumab-AVD (new standard, S1826), or BrECADD, or A+AVD Advanced, ≥60 years Nivolumab-AVD now preferred; bleomycin lung toxicity mortality up to 25% in >60 — avoid Frail/unfit Sequential BV→AVD→BV, or attenuated regimens (VEPEMB, PVAG)
Relapsed Salvage → ASCT (fit); checkpoint inhibitors for transplant-ineligible Late effects: secondary MDS/AML (6–9%, per Pathy's), anthracycline cardiomyopathy, radiation-related breast/lung cancer, hypothyroidism, bleomycin pulmonary fibrosis.
Latest Updates (2023–Present)
WHO-HAEM5 repositioned HL among B-cell neoplasms. ICC renamed NLPHL as "NLPBL" — WHO retained NLPHL. SWOG S1826 (older-patient subset, ≥60, JCO 2025): nivolumab-AVD vs BV-AVD — 2-yr PFS 89% vs 64% (HR 0.24), 2-yr OS 96% vs 85%; fewer sepsis episodes and less neuropathy. Contrast with ECHELON-1 where BV-AVD showed NO benefit over 60 — nivolumab-AVD is a genuine breakthrough for older patients. GHSG HD21 (BrECADD): comparable PFS in 61–75 age group but febrile neutropenia 54% vs 13% with nivolumab-AVD — decisive MD Geriatrics – Haematology Compendium Page 21 of 34 difference in frail elderly.
Current Practice Update
Domain Pathy's (2022) Current evidence
Coverage None — only late-effect MDS/AML risk Fully covered by WHO-HAEM5/ESMO/NCCN Advanced-stage Not addressed Nivolumab-AVD (S1826) preferred, especially ≥60 therapy yrs Late effects Correctly states 6–9% secondary MDS/AML risk — still Confirmed; termed MN-pCT under WHO 2022 valid MD Geriatrics – Haematology Compendium Page 22 of 34
How was your recall?
Rating marks the question complete. “Need another pass” also adds it to your bookmarks.
References
- PAPERS-2-3-4_COMBINED.pdf — page 860
- GeriQBank source PDF — p. 860
Spotted an error or something out of date?Report a problem with this page