GeriQBank · Paper II · Q36
Vertebral secondaries with unknown primary — evaluation and treatment
- Chapter
- Part VI — Oncology
- Years asked
- Not recorded in the source
- Frequency
- No university frequency data for this paper yet
Detailed answer
Pro · free in betaAttempt it firstOutline your answer as a 7-mark answer before revealing it — definition, causes, evaluation, management and the geriatric angle.Reveal answer
7 MARKS
Answer — Textbook Core (6 points)
Clinical recognition. Suspect metastatic disease in any older patient with back pain that is progressive, unremitting, worse at night or at rest, associated with weight loss or a known cancer, or accompanied by neurological signs. Red flags: age >50 with new back pain, thoracic pain, band-like radiation, bowel or bladder dysfunction, saddle anaesthesia and progressive weakness — these indicate possible metastatic spinal cord compression, an oncological emergency.
The likely primaries. The mnemonic for bone metastasis is "BLT with a Kosher Pickle" — Breast, Lung, Thyroid, Kidney and Prostate, which together account for about 80%. Osteolytic lesions come typically from lung, kidney, thyroid and myeloma; osteoblastic (sclerotic) from prostate and, in women, breast; mixed from breast and gastrointestinal tumours. Spread is largely via the valveless Batson venous plexus, which explains vertebral predilection.
Essential differential diagnosis. Multiple myeloma (must always be excluded — it is not a "metastasis" and requires different treatment), osteoporotic vertebral fracture, tuberculous spondylitis (Pott's disease — extremely important in India, typically involving the disc space with a paravertebral abscess, whereas malignancy characteristically spares the disc), pyogenic osteomyelitis, Paget's disease and lymphoma.
Evaluation — step 1 (confirm and localise). MRI of the whole spine is the investigation of choice (detects cord compression, multiple levels and soft tissue extension; malignancy typically involves the vertebral body and pedicle while sparing the disc). Then CT chest, abdomen and pelvis. Baseline tests: complete blood count, ESR, calcium, ALP, renal and liver function, LDH, urinalysis. Serum protein electrophoresis with free light chains and urine Bence-Jones protein in every case.
Evaluation — step 2 (find the primary). Careful examination of breasts, thyroid, testes, skin, lymph nodes and a digital rectal examination. Targeted tumour markers — PSA in men, and CA-125, CA 19-9, CEA and AFP as guided (of limited specificity). Mammography in women; FDG PET-CT to identify an occult primary and assess disease extent. Biopsy of the most accessible lesion is mandatory — with immunohistochemistry (CK7/CK20 pattern, TTF-1 for lung and thyroid, PSA/NKX3.1 for prostate, ER/PR/GATA3 for breast, thyroglobulin, PAX8 for renal and ovarian). Despite full workup, the primary remains unidentified in 20–30%.
Treatment. If cord compression is present, this is an emergency: give dexamethasone 8–16 mg immediately, then urgent MRI and neurosurgical or radiotherapy referral within 24 hours — surgical decompression with stabilisation followed by radiotherapy gives better ambulatory outcomes than radiotherapy alone in fit patients with a single level and a prognosis over 3 months. Otherwise: palliative external beam radiotherapy (a single 8 Gy fraction is as effective as multi-fraction regimens for uncomplicated bone pain); bone-modifying agents — zoledronic acid or denosumab to reduce skeletal-related events; analgesia by the WHO ladder; treatment of hypercalcaemia; vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty for mechanical pain; and treat according to the identified primary. Where no primary is found, treat by histological subtype and immunohistochemical/molecular profile, with early involvement of palliative care and honest prognostic discussion (median survival in carcinoma of unknown primary with bone metastases is only a few months).
Latest Update (2023–2026) — 1 point
Molecularly guided therapy for carcinoma of unknown primary — the CUPISCO trial (Lancet 2024). In patients with unfavourable-risk CUP who did not progress after platinum induction chemotherapy, comprehensive genomic profiling followed by molecularly guided targeted therapy or immunotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival compared with continuing standard chemotherapy. This, together with the ESMO 2023 CUP guideline, has changed practice: next-generation sequencing and PD-L1/MSI testing should now be performed in every patient with unknown primary who is fit for treatment, and site-of-origin gene expression profiling can further direct therapy.
How was your recall?
Rating marks the question complete. “Need another pass” also adds it to your bookmarks.
References
- PAPERS-2-3-4_COMBINED.pdf — page 37
- GeriQBank source PDF — p. 37
Spotted an error or something out of date?Report a problem with this page