Skip to content
GERICLINICS

GeriQBank · Paper IV · Q21

Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

Moderate YieldAsked ×17-mark note
Chapter
Neurology
Years asked
Not recorded in the source
Frequency
Set 1× in Paper III (2009–2025)

As set in the university paper

  • Normal pressure hydrocephalus.

    Paper III · Cognition, Dementia & Delirium · asked ×1 · 7-mark note · see in paper list

Answer framework

  1. Definition and history — the triad without high pressure or obstruction; reversible but under-recognised; Hakim and Adams; Evans' ratio
  2. Epidemiology — prevalence and incidence by age; nursing homes
  3. Pathophysiology — cerebral dyshomeostasis; associations
  4. Clinical presentation — gait; cognition; urinary symptoms; the severity scale
  5. Differential diagnosis
  6. Imaging and diagnostic criteria — imaging features; DESH; American criteria; Japanese criteria
  7. Supplementary predictive tests — tap test; extended lumbar drainage; infusion test and B-waves; CSF biomarkers
  8. Treatment, outcome and complications
  9. Recent updates — PENS; Cochrane; Swedish prevalence; glymphatic dysfunction; predictive tests; valves; India

An exam answer plan drawn from the detailed answer below. Use it to attempt the question first.

Detailed answer

Pro · free in beta
Attempt it firstOutline your answer as a 7-mark note before revealing it — definition, causes, evaluation, management and the geriatric angle.Reveal answer

Short revision answer

  • NPH is adult-onset ventriculomegaly with the Hakim–Adams triad — gait disturbance, cognitive decline, urinary incontinence — without high CSF pressure or obstruction. It is potentially reversible but under-recognised (often blamed on ageing). Hakim and Adams recognised it in 1957 and published in 1965; Evans' ratio dates from 1942.
  • Epidemiology: crude prevalence 10–22/100,000 (probable) and 29/100,000 (possible); age-specific rates rise from 3.3/100,000 at 50–59 to 5.9% at 80+; incidence reaches 1.2/1,000/year over 70; 9–14% in nursing homes.
  • Mechanism: not just CSF flow — impaired resorption, reduced compliance, periventricular hypoperfusion and ischaemia, altered metabolism, oedema, demyelination and neurotoxin accumulation ("cerebral dyshomeostasis"). Associations include cardiac systolic dysfunction and obstructive sleep apnoea.
  • Gait comes first and dominates: wide-based, slow and magnetic, with small steps, poor foot clearance, start hesitation, difficult turning and tandem walking, and falls (Dutch study: 25 steps and 16 seconds for 10 m vs 15 steps and 8 seconds). Cognition is frontal-executive and subcortical — recall worse than recognition (both fail in AD), slowed speed, inattention. Bladder: frequency and urgency → urge → complete incontinence (capacity ~200 mL, detrusor overactivity; reversible). The iNPH Grading Scale scores each domain 0–4.
  • Differential: AD, FTD and vascular cognitive impairment; PD, vascular parkinsonism and Parkinson-plus; primary progressive freezing gait; lumbar canal stenosis. NPH gait doesn't respond to cues or levodopa and lacks tremor and rigidity.
  • Imaging: ventriculomegaly not explained by atrophy (Evans' index >0.3), no obstruction, an aqueductal flow void, plus enlarged temporal horns, callosal angle ≤90° or periventricular water change. DESH (tight high-convexity sulci, wide Sylvian fissures) is stressed by the 2012 Japanese criteria. American criteria (probable/possible/unlikely): insidious onset after 40, at least 3–6 months, progression, gait plus cognitive or urinary impairment, opening pressure 5–18 mmHg (70–245 mm H2O). Japanese: possible (onset in the 60s or later, Evans >0.3), probable (pressure ≤200 mm H2O plus DESH or a positive tap or drainage test), definite (improvement after shunting).
  • Predictive tests: tap test — gait speed in single- and dual-task conditions, best at 24–48 and 48–72 hours; sensitivity only 26–61%, so a negative test doesn't exclude NPH. Extended lumbar drainage (100–150 mL/day for about four days): sensitivity 50–100%, PPV 80–100%; stop for headache, root irritation or meningitis; prior stroke predicts a poorer and DESH a better outcome. Infusion test (outflow resistance; sensitivity 57–100%, PPV 75–92%); ICP pulsatility and B-waves matter more than static pressure. CSF: Aβ42 falls in both NPH and AD, but phospho-tau rises only in AD.
  • Treatment: CSF diversion is the only proven treatment (repeated LPs don't work long-term). VP shunting succeeds in about 80% — gait 81–86%, bladder 70%, cognition 40–44%; 96% subjective and 83% timed-walk improvement at six months, against ~11% serious adverse events; age isn't prognostic. Complications: infection, subdural effusion (raise the adjustable valve setting), obstruction, fracture, transient hearing loss; ETV may fail if the stoma closes.
  • Updates: PENS (NEJM 2025; 99 drainage-responsive patients, 17 centres; blinded open vs placebo valve) — gait velocity +0.23 vs +0.03 m/s (difference 0.21), ventricular volume −27.4 vs −4.4 mL, falls 24.5% vs 46%; stopped early (January 2025) for efficacy; no gain in cognition or incontinence at three months — answering the 2024 Cochrane call. A Swedish MRI study (791 seventy-year-olds, 2024) shows possible iNPH is common; glymphatic dysfunction links it to AD co-pathology; DESH and callosal angle support the diagnosis, but CSF removal tests select responders; adjustable anti-siphon valves are standard (COVLINPH-1 compares VP and LP shunts). India: a tap test with 10-metre gait speed before and 24–72 hours after LP is a cheap screen for any geriatric unit.

Condensed by GeriClinics from the detailed answer below, with no new facts added.

21.

Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Fifteen–Twenty High-Yield Points Definition and historical background

1.

NPH is an adult-onset chronic condition with enlarged cerebral ventricles on imaging plus the clinical Hakim and Adams triad — gait disturbance, cognitive decline and urinary incontinence — occurring without high CSF pressure or obstruction to flow through the ventricular system and subarachnoid space.

2.

It is a potentially reversible neurological disease, but the mechanisms are unclear and awareness is poor, leading to under-recognition and undertreatment. In older people the triad overlaps other age-related diseases and may be wrongly attributed to ageing itself as a result of ageism.

3.

Hakim and Adams recognised the syndrome in 1957 and published it in 1965, linking the triad definitively to CSF accumulation in the ventricles and showing improvement after lumbar puncture and shunt diversion. Evans' ratio was described in 1942 following the introduction of air ventriculography in 1918.

Epidemiology

4.

Crude prevalence is 10–22/100,000 for probable NPH and 29/100,000 for possible NPH. Age-specific rates rise from 3.3/100,000 at age 50–59 to 5.9% in those aged 80 and above. Incidence rises from 0.07/100,000/year under 60 to 1.2/1,000/year over 70. In nursing homes, incidence rates are 9–14% depending on the criteria used.

Pathophysiology

5.

Symptoms do not result simply from impaired CSF dynamics. The interacting mechanisms are altered CSF dynamics and impaired resorption, reduced intracranial compliance, abnormal cerebral perfusion with periventricular ischaemia, altered metabolism, oedema and demyelination, and accumulation of neurotoxic substances — together producing "cerebral dyshomeostasis".

6.

Recognised associations include cardiac systolic dysfunction and obstructive sleep apnoea, which is frequently co-existent and should be actively sought.

Clinical presentation

7.

Gait disturbance is the earliest and most prominent symptom — wide-based, slow, unsteady and magnetic, with disturbed tandem walking and turning, small steps, reduced floor foot clearance, start hesitation, tendency to fall and disturbed trunk balance. The Dutch NPH study quantified this as 25 steps and 16 seconds for a 10-metre walk versus 15 steps and 8 seconds in controls.

8.

Cognition shows an atypical profile combining frontal-executive, subcortical and posterior cortical impairment. Memory and orientation are relatively preserved; frontal impairment affects recall disproportionately to recognition, with attention deficit and reduced psychomotor speed. In Alzheimer's disease the temporal-lobe profile impairs both recall and recognition — the key clinical contrast.

9.

Urinary symptoms begin as frequency and urgency and progress to urge and then complete incontinence as frontal deterioration prevents recognition of the urge. Mechanisms are reduced bladder capacity (mean 200 mL), detrusor overactivity and enhanced parasympathetic activity, reversible after LP and shunting. Faecal incontinence occurs only in advanced stages.

10.

Severity is graded using the iNPH Grading Scale (iNPHGS), which scores gait, cognition and urinary function from 0 to 4 each.

Differential diagnosis

11.

Must be distinguished from Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal degeneration and vascular cognitive impairment; Parkinson's disease, vascular parkinsonism and Parkinson-plus syndromes; primary progressive freezing gait; and lumbar canal stenosis. NPH gait does not respond to external cues or to levodopa, unlike Parkinson's disease, and there is no tremor or rigidity.

Imaging and diagnostic criteria

12.

Imaging features: ventricular enlargement not entirely attributable to atrophy (Evans' index >0.3), no macroscopic obstruction to CSF flow, an aqueductal or fourth ventricular flow void on MRI, plus at least one of — enlarged temporal horns, callosal angle of 90 degrees or less, or altered brain water content not attributable to microvascular ischaemia or demyelination.

13.

DESH — disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus, i.e. narrowed sulci and subarachnoid spaces over the high convexity and midline with dilated Sylvian fissures — is stressed by the revised 2012 Japanese criteria as a very important diagnostic criterion, which can only be overcome by evidence of improvement after a CSF tap or drainage test.

14.

American guidelines (Relkin, Marmarou et al.) classify NPH as probable, possible or unlikely. Supporting history: insidious onset after age 40, duration of at least 3–6 months, progression over time, no antecedent cause of secondary hydrocephalus, and no alternative explanation. Gait/balance disturbance must be present plus impairment of cognition, urinary function or both. Probable NPH requires an opening pressure of 5–18 mmHg (70–245 mm H2O); higher or lower pressures are inconsistent with the diagnosis.

15.

Japanese criteria: possible iNPH — onset in the 60s or later, more than one triad element, Evans' index >0.3, no other explanation, and no obvious antecedent cause; probable — adds CSF pressure of 200 mm H2O or less with normal content, plus either DESH, or improvement after the CSF tap test, or improvement after the drainage test; definite iNPH — improvement of symptoms after the shunt procedure.

Supplementary predictive tests

16.

CSF tap test (high-volume LP): walking speed is assessed in single-task and dual-task conditions, with maximal improvement 24–48 hours after LP for single-task tests and 48–72 hours for dual-task tests, returning to the pre-LP state after a few weeks, which further supports the diagnosis. Sensitivity is low (26–61%), so a negative tap test cannot exclude NPH; a positive test carries greater certainty of shunt response than clinical examination alone.

17.

Extended lumbar drainage (ELD): a lumbar catheter draining 100–150 mL of CSF per day for about four days, with daily assessment of gait and cognition. Sensitivity 50–100% and positive predictive value 80–100%, better than LP alone, but a negative result has deceptively low value because of frequent false negatives. Discontinue for low-pressure headache, nerve root irritation or signs of meningitis. Prior stroke predicts a worse outcome; DESH predicts a better one.

18.

CSF outflow resistance (Ro) by infusion test has sensitivity 57–100% and PPV 75–92%. Static ICP measurement does not predict surgical outcome — it is ICP pulsatility and B-waves (slow rhythmic oscillations at 0.33–3 cycles/minute) that carry clinical significance, indicating reduced intracranial compliance.

19.

CSF biomarkers: a decrease in A-beta-42 is seen in both NPH and Alzheimer's disease, but a rise in phospho-tau is seen only in Alzheimer's — useful for differential diagnosis, although no CSF test has prognostic value before shunting.

Treatment, outcome and complications

20.

CSF diversion is the only evidence-based curative treatment; repeated high-volume lumbar punctures have no long-term efficacy in non-operated patients. Ventriculoperitoneal shunting is standard care and succeeds in about 80% of cases. Improvement is greatest for gait (81–86%) and bladder control (70%) and least consistent for cognition (40–44%); there is a 96% chance of subjective improvement and 83% chance of improvement on timed walk at six months, against a serious adverse event risk of about 11%. Age is not a prognostic factor. Complications include shunt infection (a neurosurgical emergency), subdural effusion (managed by raising the setting of an adjustable valve), obstruction, catheter fracture and transient hearing loss; ventricles do not necessarily shrink after successful shunting. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy avoids shunt hardware but may fail if the stoma closes.

Latest Updates (2023 – Present)

The PENS trial is the single most important development and is now the definitive evidence base. Placebo-Controlled Effectiveness in iNPH Shunting (Luciano, Williams and Hamilton et al., NEJM 2025;393:2198–2209) randomised 99 patients across 17 centres in the US, Canada and Sweden — all of whom had responded to temporary CSF drainage — to an open versus placebo setting on a non-invasively adjustable valve, keeping patients and assessors blinded.

Result: gait velocity improved by 0.23 m/s with an open shunt versus 0.03 m/s with placebo — treatment difference 0.21 m/s (p<0.001). Lateral ventricular volume fell by 27.4 mL versus 4.4 mL. Falls were significantly fewer with an open shunt (24.5% versus 46%, p=0.03). The DSMB stopped enrolment early at the second interim analysis (January 2025) for efficacy.

Crucially, PENS confirmed benefit for gait and balance but NOT for cognition or incontinence at three months — validating the textbook observation that gait responds best and providing a realistic basis for counselling patients and families.

PENS answers long-standing scepticism about shunting: there had been calls for a moratorium on grounds of variable results, questionable durability of benefit, surgical risk and a potential strong placebo effect. The 2024 Cochrane review (CD014923) had concluded that further studies were needed to increase certainty; PENS supplies that certainty.

Prevalence data have been refined: a Swedish population-based MRI study of 791 seventy-year-olds (Neurology 2024;102:e208037) confirms possible iNPH is far commoner in the community than clinic-based figures suggest, reinforcing that this is an under-diagnosed treatable cause of disability in old age. Glymphatic dysfunction is now central to the accepted pathophysiology — impaired perivascular clearance with accumulation of neurotoxic metabolites — linking iNPH mechanistically to Alzheimer's co-pathology and explaining why cognition responds less reliably than gait.

Contemporary reviews (Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 2024) reaffirm that DESH and reduced callosal angle support the diagnosis but have limited predictive value for treatment response — the provocative CSF removal tests (tap test, infusion test, extended lumbar drainage) remain what actually stratifies who will respond, and adding them progressively increases predictive power.

Programmable, non-invasively adjustable valves with anti-siphon devices are now standard, allowing pressure adjustment for over-drainage and subdural collections without reoperation — and it is precisely this technology that made the blinded placebo-controlled PENS design possible. VP versus lumboperitoneal shunting is being compared head-to-head (COVLINPH-1, primary outcome shunt failure at five years).

Indian context: iNPH is markedly under-recognised, and the practical barriers are access to neurosurgical services and to programmable valves. A tap test with objective 10-metre gait speed measured before and 24–72 hours after LP is a cheap, reproducible screening strategy any geriatric unit can implement, and should be considered in every older patient with unexplained gait apraxia plus cognitive or urinary symptoms.

Current Practice Update

Aspect Textbook position

Current evidence / practice

Evidence for shunting About 80% success from observational series; PENS trial (NEJM 2025) — first adequately effectiveness questioned, with calls for a powered blinded RCT; confirms benefit and was moratorium stopped early for efficacy Which symptom improves Gait and bladder best, cognition least consistent Confirmed and sharpened: significant gain in gait velocity and balance, no significant gain in cognition or incontinence at 3 months Falls Not a formal endpoint Shunting roughly halves falls (24.5% versus 46%)

— a directly relevant geriatric outcome Pathophysiology Altered CSF dynamics, perfusion, ischaemia, Adds glymphatic system dysfunction as a neurotoxic accumulation unifying mechanism Imaging markers DESH stressed as a key diagnostic criterion DESH and callosal angle support diagnosis but (Japanese 2012) poorly predict shunt response; CSF removal tests remain the selection tool Valve technology Adjustable valves available Non-invasively adjustable valves with anti-siphon devices are standard, and enabled the placebo-controlled trial design

How was your recall?

Rating marks the question complete. “Need another pass” also adds it to your bookmarks.

References

Spotted an error or something out of date?Report a problem with this page