Skip to content
GERICLINICS

GeriQBank · Paper II · Q6

Geriatric Depression Scale — administration and interpretation

Not rated7-mark answer
Chapter
Section A — Mood Disorders and Depression
Years asked
Not recorded in the source
Frequency
No university frequency data for this paper yet

Detailed answer

Pro · free in beta
Attempt it firstOutline your answer as a 7-mark answer before revealing it — definition, causes, evaluation, management and the geriatric angle.Reveal answer

Textbook Core — 6 Points

1.

Purpose. A screening — not diagnostic — instrument for depression in older adults, developed by Yesavage and Brink (1982). Its defining feature is that it deliberately excludes somatic items (appetite, sleep, weight, libido, energy) that overlap with physical illness in old age, and instead asks about mood, satisfaction and outlook.

2.

Format and administration. Simple yes/no answers referring to the past one week. Versions: the original GDS-30, the widely used GDS-15, and ultra-brief GDS-10, GDS-5 and GDS-4. It may be self-administered or interviewer-administered (read aloud for visual impairment or low literacy); GDS-15 takes about 5 minutes, GDS-30 about 10.

3.

Scoring. One point for each answer in the depressed direction; some items are positively worded and reverse-scored (a "no" scores the point). GDS-15: 0–4 normal, 5–8 mild, 9–11 moderate, 12–15 severe — the usual screen-positive cut-off is ≥5. GDS-30: a score ≥11 suggests depression.

4.

Interpretation. A positive score is not a diagnosis — it mandates a full diagnostic interview against DSM-5 / ICD-11 criteria, plus explicit assessment of suicidal ideation (asking about suicide does not increase risk and usually relieves the patient). Serial scores are useful to monitor treatment response.

5.

Advantages. The yes/no format suits cognitive and sensory impairment; validated across community, outpatient, hospital and long-term-care settings; free of cost, brief, and translated and validated in multiple Indian languages; sensitivity and specificity around 80–90% for GDS-15. The GDS-3A subset of three items can also screen for apathy.

6.

Limitations. Unreliable in moderate-to-severe dementia (MMSE below about 15) — the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD), which uses informant input, should be used instead. Performance is affected by education, literacy, culture and language; it is not valid in delirium; and it does not assess severity for treatment selection or cover psychotic features.

Latest Update — 1 Point

7.

Screening policy (2023–2025). The USPSTF (2023, JAMA) reaffirmed with a Grade B recommendation that all adults, including older adults, be screened for depression wherever systems exist for accurate diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Current evidence supports PHQ-2/PHQ-9 and GDS-15 as interchangeable first-line tools, with the Cornell Scale reserved for those with dementia. In India, the NPHCE and Ayushman Arogya Mandirs now include routine depression screening of older adults at the primary-care level, with referral through Tele-MANAS (14416).

Current Practice Update

Aspect Textbook Current recommendation Exam approach Tool of choice GDS-15/GDS-30 listed as the PHQ-2 → PHQ-9 or GDS-15 are Name GDS-15 first, then state assessment tool, PHQ-2 as interchangeable; CSDD if when to switch to the Cornell Scale screener dementia present Who to screen Screen when clinically suspected USPSTF 2023 — screen all Quote "USPSTF 2023, Grade B" for adults, provided follow-up systems a guaranteed mark exist Exam one-liners: Yesavage & Brink 1982 · yes/no format · past one week · somatic items deliberately excluded · GDS-15 cut-off ≥5 · GDS-30 cut-off ≥11 · GDS-15 takes 5 minutes · invalid if MMSE <15 → use Cornell Scale · screening tool, never diagnostic. If asked for 15 marks, add: the item list of the GDS-15 with reverse-scored items identified; comparison table of GDS vs PHQ-9 vs CSDD vs Hamilton and Montgomery–Åsberg scales; psychometric data (validation studies, Cronbach's alpha, ROC cut-offs by setting); use in special populations (stroke, Parkinson's disease, hospitalised, long-term care); Indian validation studies and LASI data on late-life depression prevalence; and the collaborative-care model of stepped depression management following a positive screen. Section B — Suicide, Self-Harm and Clinical Emergencies Suicide risk in older people, and the two clinical vignettes that test it in practice.

How was your recall?

Rating marks the question complete. “Need another pass” also adds it to your bookmarks.

References

Spotted an error or something out of date?Report a problem with this page