GeriQBank · Paper IV · Q5
Pressure Sores: Stages, Common Sites, Prevention and Treatment
- Chapter
- Falls, Fracture Prevention & Pressure Injuries
- Years asked
- Not recorded in the source
- Frequency
- Set 2× in Paper IV (2009–2025)
As set in the university paper
Pressure sores — enumerate the prevention of pressure sores in an elderly bedbound patient. What are the stages of a pressure sore and the common sites involved? How is it preventable and what is the appropriate treatment for each stage?
Paper IV · Falls, Immobility & Pressure Ulcers · asked ×2 · 7-mark note · see in paper list
Answer framework
- Definition and pathogenesis — pressure injury versus ulcer; incidence; the four forces; the iceberg effect
- NPIAP staging — Stages 1 to 4; unstageable and deep tissue injury; device and mucosal injuries; PUSH, not reverse staging
- Common sites — the lower body; sites by posture; overlooked sites
- Risk factors and assessment — risk factors; age not independent; Norton, Braden and Waterlow
- Prevention — skin care; nutrition; support surfaces; repositioning; avoidability
- Treatment — treat the causes; local care by stage; diagnosing infection; adjuncts; skin failure; documentation
- Recent updates — 2025 international guideline; 2- or 3-hourly turning; harms of over-turning; positioning; micromovements; early mobilisation; sensors; prophylactic dressings and SEM; device injuries; Indian data
An exam answer plan drawn from the detailed answer below. Use it to attempt the question first.
Detailed answer
Pro · free in betaAttempt it firstOutline your answer as a 7-mark note before revealing it — definition, causes, evaluation, management and the geriatric angle.Reveal answer
Short revision answer
- A pressure injury is localised damage to skin and deeper tissue, usually over a bony prominence, from disrupted blood supply — "injury" because not all are open ulcers. Incidence: acute care 0.4–38%, long-term care 2.2–23.9%; about 25% start in the operating theatre.
- Four forces act together: pressure, shear (head of bed raised, torso slides onto the sacrum), friction and moisture. The deep damage is larger than the visible ulcer (the "iceberg" effect).
- NPIAP stages (Arabic numerals, only when depth is visible): 1 — non-blanchable erythema of intact skin persisting beyond 30 minutes (may look red, blue or purple in darker skin); 2 — partial thickness (blister, abrasion, shallow ulcer); 3 — full thickness through fat, down to but not through fascia (crater, undermining); 4 — through fascia with bone visible, sinus tracts, osteomyelitis.
- Unstageable = base hidden by eschar or necrotic tissue; deep tissue injury = intact deep red, purple or maroon skin or a blood blister. Device-related injuries are staged; mucosal injuries are not. Never reverse-stage — track healing with the PUSH tool (size, exudate, tissue type).
- Over 90% occur in the lower body — sacrum and coccyx, ischial tuberosities, greater trochanter and heels. Sites change with posture (sitting: ischial tuberosities; lateral: trochanter, malleoli). Easily overlooked: gluteal cleft, elbows, malleoli, wrists.
- Risk: bed- or chair-bound, unable to reposition, stroke, faecal incontinence, low weight, poor intake, an existing Stage 1 injury, dry sacral skin — advanced age itself is not an independent risk. Apply Norton, Braden or Waterlow on admission and regularly.
- Prevention: reduce pressure, friction and skin folding; keep skin clean and dry; avoid excess bed rest and over-sedation; 30–35 kcal/kg/day, protein 1–1.5 g/kg/day, fluid 1 mL/kcal. Foam or sheepskin overlays beat standard mattresses; turn at least 2-hourly on a regular and 4-hourly on a pressure-reducing mattress. Not all injuries are avoidable, but prevention must be in place first.
- Treatment: correcting the causes matters more than any dressing; local care needs moisture balance, bacterial balance and debridement. Stages 1–2: saline cleaning and an occlusive dressing (none is superior). Stage 3: debride; no routine cultures; systemic antibiotics only for bacteraemia, sepsis, osteomyelitis or cellulitis. Stage 4: tissue biopsy culture, antibiotics and surgical opinion.
- Infection: increasing pain is the best predictor (LR 11–20); classic signs and odour don't help; take a Levine swab over 1 × 1 cm for 5 seconds. Adjuncts (NPWT, hyperbaric oxygen, ultrasound) lack evidence. Document size, tissue colours, exudate, odour, periwound and undermining. In terminal decline, call it skin failure.
- 2025 guideline updates: 2- or 3-hourly turning are both acceptable on a proper surface (not routinely 4–6 hourly); over-frequent turning harms sleep, causes pain and injures staff; 30-degree tilt and head of bed ≤30 degrees; micromovements for unstable patients; early mobilisation cuts injuries (RR 0.75); silicone foam dressings on sacrum and heels for high risk; SEM and scalp checks; device injuries exceed 30% in acute care. India: prevalence 7.8%, with Grade III commonest (42.8%) — caregiver education and low-cost overlays matter most.
Condensed by GeriClinics from the detailed answer below, with no new facts added.
15 MARKS | 20 HIGH-YIELD POINTS
A. Definition, Terminology and Pathogenesis
A pressure injury is localised damage to the skin and underlying tissue, usually over a bony prominence (sacrum, heels), caused by disruption of blood supply, preventing oxygen and nutrients from reaching cells. "Pressure injury" is a more accurate term than "pressure ulcer" because some presentations are not open ulcers.
Incidence varies widely by setting: acute care 0.4–38%, long-term care 2.2–23.9%, home care 0–17%. About 25% of pressure ulcers are acquired intra-operatively.
Four mechanical forces operate together:
Pressure over a bony prominence → tissue deformation and ischaemia
Shear — head of bed elevated, torso slides down, transmitting force to the sacrum; stretches and angulates subcutaneous tissue
Friction — repeated movement of skin across sheets/clothing, which increases shear
Moisture — sweat, urine, faeces, bathing Together these cause thrombosis of small blood vessels, undermining then destroying skin. Loose, folded skin (loss of subcutaneous fat, dehydration) worsens shear.
The area of damage beneath the ulcer is often much larger than the visible ulcer — the "iceberg" effect — because pressure and shear are transmitted deep into subcutaneous tissue.
B. Staging (NPIAP System)
Pressure injuries are numerically staged 1, 2, 3 or 4 — using Arabic, not Roman, numerals — only if the depth of the wound can be visualised.
Stage 1 — Non-blanchable erythema of intact skin. Acute inflammatory response limited to epidermis. Irregular area of erythema, induration and oedema, which may feel firm or boggy. Redness persists beyond 30 minutes and does not blanch on pressure. In darker skin the colour may be red, blue or purple. Skin is unbroken.
Stage 2 — Partial-thickness loss. Inflammation extends through the dermis to the junction of subcutaneous fat. Appears as a blister, abrasion or shallow ulcer with distinct edges. Early fibrosis and pigment change occur.
Stage 3 — Full-thickness skin loss extending through subcutaneous fat, down to but not through the underlying fascia. Presents as a crater, often with undermining of adjacent tissue. Base may be infected with necrotic, foul-smelling tissue.
Stage 4 — Extension through deep fascia, with bone visible at the base. Undermining is even more common and sinus tracts may be present. Osteomyelitis and septic arthritis can occur.
Two additional categories when depth cannot be seen:
Unstageable pressure injury — wound base obscured by eschar and/or necrotic tissue; can be staged once debrided
Deep tissue pressure injury (DTPI) — skin intact but deep red, purple or maroon, or a haemorrhagic blister, indicating damage in deeper tissue
Special situations:
Medical device–related pressure injuries — from urinary catheters, rectal tubes, oxygen tubing, NIV masks; the wound conforms to the shape of the device. These ARE staged.
Mucous membrane pressure injuries must NOT be staged — only documented.
Reverse staging is inaccurate for assessing healing. Use the PUSH tool (Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing), which scores size, exudate amount and tissue type and is sensitive to change over time.
C. Common Sites
More than 90% of pressure ulcers occur in the lower body — principally the sacral and coccygeal area, ischial tuberosities and greater trochanter, along with the heels.
Site varies with posture:
Position Pressure points
Supine Occiput, scapulae, elbows, sacrum, coccyx, buttocks, heels Lateral Ear, shoulder, greater trochanter, ribs, malleoli, knees, bent lower leg Sitting Ischial tuberosities, coccyx, sacrum, back of knees, heels Prone Forehead, chin, cheeks, chest/breasts, iliac crests, genitalia, knees, dorsum of feet Easily overlooked sites: gluteal cleft, elbows, malleoli, wrists.
D. Risk Factors and Risk Assessment
Risk factors: being bed- or chair-bound, unable to reposition without assistance, difficulty with ambulation, history of stroke, faecal incontinence, low body weight, lymphopenia, difficulty with independent feeding, impaired nutritional intake, non-blanchable erythema of intact skin (i.e. an existing Stage 1 injury) and dry sacral skin. Advanced age itself is NOT an independent risk factor — it is the coexisting impairments in mobility, nutrition and skin health that matter.
Risk-assessment tools: Norton, Braden and Waterlow scales. Current recommendation is to apply a tool on admission to a facility and regularly thereafter. Because risk is multifactorial, multidisciplinary multifactorial intervention is effective — as with falls and delirium.
E. Prevention
General principles of skin care in the immobile patient:
Identify patients at risk
Decrease pressure, friction and skin folding
Keep skin clean and dry; moisturise dry sacral skin
Avoid excessive bed rest — optimise and encourage function
Avoid over-sedation
Nutrition and hydration: 30–35 kcal/kg/day, protein 1–1.5 g/kg/day, fluid 1 mL/kcal; dietitian referral for those at risk
Support surfaces:
Non-powered — mattresses or overlays filled with air, water, gel or foam
Powered — mechanically vary the pressure beneath the patient, reducing the duration of applied pressure; far more costly
Specialised foam and sheepskin overlays reduce incidence compared with a standard hospital mattress; the choice between powered and non-powered is not clear
Mattress overlays on operating tables reduce postoperative pressure injuries
Repositioning: at least 2-hourly on a regular mattress, at least 4-hourly on a pressure-reducing mattress
Avoidability: Not all pressure injuries are avoidable, particularly at the end of life — but prevention protocols must be in place before concluding that an injury was unavoidable.
F. Treatment
Stage-wise management. Overarching principle — managing the underlying contributing factors is more important than topical or adjunctive therapy. Standard local care of a healable ulcer must satisfy three criteria: moisture balance, bacterial balance and debridement.
Stages 1–2: continue all preventive measures to stop progression. Clean with warm normal saline or water; avoid pressure and moisture; cover open wounds with an occlusive dressing chosen by wound condition, drainage and infection; use antibiotics very judiciously; manage pain. No single dressing has been shown superior to another.
Stage 3: debride necrotic tissue (autolytic, chemical, mechanical, sharp or surgical); irrigate 2–3 times daily; undermine and remove eschar if it conceals necrotic or infected tissue. Routine wound cultures are not warranted — they grow multiple organisms, miss anaerobes and reflect colonisation. Systemic antibiotics do not reach adequate concentration in the ulcer; reserve them for confirmed bacteraemia, sepsis, osteomyelitis or cellulitis.
Stage 4: tissue biopsy for routine and anaerobic culture; systemic antimicrobials are often necessary; surgical/plastic consultation for repair. If septic, use broad-spectrum cover for anaerobes, Gram-negatives and Staphylococcus aureus.
Diagnosing infection: increasing pain in a chronic wound is the strongest predictor (LR 11–20). The "classic signs" — purulent exudate, erythema, heat, oedema — and foul odour are NOT helpful. Use a quantitative swab by the Levine technique (rotate swab over a 1 × 1 cm area for 5 seconds with enough pressure to express fluid): positive LR 6.3, negative LR 0.47.
Adjunctive therapies (negative-pressure wound therapy, hyperbaric oxygen, laser, electrotherapy, electromagnetic therapy, therapeutic ultrasound): no good evidence that they improve healing.
Non-healable injuries / skin failure: where underlying conditions are irreversible or goals are comfort, prioritise reducing infection risk and controlling pain. Wounds appearing on bony prominences during overall decline are termed skin failure, not pressure injuries.
Documentation must include: type and duration; size as length × width × depth in cm; colour as percentage red (granulation) / yellow (slough) / black (eschar); exudate (serous, serosanguinous, sanguinous, purulent); odour assessed after cleaning; periwound tissue; and undermining.
LATEST UPDATES (2023–PRESENT)
Fourth edition of the International Pressure Injury Guideline (NPIAP/ EPUAP/PPPIA, 2025) — a rolling, online guideline. Partner organisations NPIAP, EPUAP and PPPIA are releasing the fourth edition with an expanded online format and staged release of chapters, plus refreshed quick-reference materials, governed by a Guideline Governance Group led by Professor Janet Cuddigan with over 240 clinical experts and consumer representatives using evidence-to-decision frameworks. Chapters live include Definition & Etiology, Preventive Skin Care, Nutrition, Repositioning, Support Surfaces, Seating, Heel Pressure Injuries and Device-Related Pressure Injuries, with Pressure Injury Risk and Skin & Tissue Assessment to follow.
The "2-hourly turn" is no longer mandatory. A meta-analysis of two RCTs in aged-care settings found 2-hourly repositioning was associated with a non-significant and counter-intuitively higher rate of pressure injuries than 3-hourly (1.3% vs 0.3%, RR 4.06, 95% CI 0.87–18.98). The guideline therefore suggests that either 2-hourly or 3-hourly repositioning may be used for most at-risk individuals, provided an appropriate pressure-redistribution support surface is in place (conditional recommendation, very low certainty). However, it suggests against routinely extending intervals to 4, 5 or 6 hourly, since a meta-analysis of five RCTs showed fewer injuries with 2-hourly turning (4.6% vs 5.7%, RR 0.89).
The harms of over-frequent turning are now formally recognised. A Cochrane review documented sleep disruption, musculoskeletal pain, wound pain and more injuries to care staff with shorter intervals. Staff compliance is higher at 3- and 4-hourly intervals (90–95%) than at 2-hourly (80%), and two economic analyses showed extending from 2-hourly to 3-hourly was more cost-effective when tolerated.
Positioning specifics with new evidence. 30-degree lateral positioning is suggested over greater angles (avoid the 90-degree lateral position), modified to 40 degrees in individuals with high BMI who cannot maintain it. Head-of-bed elevation should be kept at 30 degrees or lower — restricting elevation gave 68 fewer pressure injuries per 1,000 (11.1% vs 18.9%, OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.36–0.97) — but a lower head-of-bed increased ventilator-associated pneumonia (OR 2.15) and gastric reflux (OR 1.85), so clinical needs may override.
Micromovements for the haemodynamically unstable. It is now good practice to use frequent, small, incremental shifts (micromovements) in critically ill individuals too unstable for a regular repositioning regimen, with a trial of full body repositioning at least every 8 hours to see if regular turning can resume, allowing at least ten minutes for haemodynamic equilibrium after each position change.
Early mobilisation is now an evidence-based pressure injury intervention. A meta-analysis of six RCTs and six comparative studies showed early mobilisation significantly reduced pressure injuries (5.2% vs 6.9%, RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61–0.92) — 17 fewer per 1,000. It also prevented ICU-acquired weakness (RR 0.49), deep vein thrombosis (RR 0.16) and pneumonia (RR 0.39), with a small increase in falls. The staged protocol is: passive range of movement → dangling limbs → sitting out of bed → standing → walking, 2–3 times daily as tolerated.
Wearable movement sensors — a conditional new option. Three studies of body-worn movement sensors showed a non-significant lower rate of pressure injuries (0.7% vs 6.9%, RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.02–1.08); sensors are suggested to help evaluate repositioning needs where resources permit, but must complement rather than replace clinical judgement, and may not detect offloading at the head, ears, elbows and heels.
Prophylactic dressings and refined skin assessment. The 2025 Preventive Skin Care chapter suggests a multilayered soft silicone foam dressing on the sacrum and heels for individuals at high risk, where resources permit (conditional, very low certainty), and specifies that skin assessment must include the scalp and under hair, using wide-toothed combs and moisturising products for curly, textured or tightly coiled hair to allow visual inspection. Subepidermal moisture (SEM) measurement and skin temperature are now recommended within skin assessment, as SEM detects inflammation and tissue damage predictive of Stage 1 and greater injuries, especially at the sacrum, and high-resolution ultrasound is valuable for deep tissue injury, particularly in darker skin tones.
Device-related injuries are a growing share of the burden. In acute care, medical device–related pressure injuries account for more than 30% of all hospital-acquired pressure injuries, largely from prolonged prone positioning with ventilation devices in the mouth and nose; sedation, oedema and increased skin moisture are contributory.
Indian data — lower prevalence but more advanced disease. A point-prevalence study in a north Indian tertiary hospital using the EPUAP minimum data set found an overall prevalence of 7.8%, with the sacrum and heel most commonly affected and, strikingly, Grade III ulcers being the commonest presentation (42.8%) — indicating late detection. ICU prevalence was 24.3%, and injuries were more frequent in patients hospitalised more than a month. An earlier Varanasi study found a prevalence of 4.94%, with anaemia, malnutrition and diabetes as key risk factors and morbidity in long-stay neurology wards as high as 40.9%. Practical Indian implications: home-based bedbound care is the dominant setting, caregiver education is the single highest-yield intervention, and low-cost foam or sheepskin overlays with disciplined repositioning outperform expensive powered mattresses that most families cannot afford.
CURRENT PRACTICE UPDATE
Domain Textbook Position Current Practice (2023–Present)
Repositioning At least 2-hourly on a regular 2-hourly or 3-hourly are both frequency mattress, 4-hourly on a pressure- acceptable on an appropriate support reducing mattress surface; individualised regimens replace fixed schedules; do not routinely extend to 4–6 hourly Rationale for More frequent turning assumed Frequent turning causes sleep disruption, change better pain and staff injury, and compliance falls at 2-hourly intervals; 3-hourly is more cost-effective Support Powered vs non-powered choice Unchanged — but explicitly stated that no surfaces unclear support surface can entirely replace repositioning Positioning Not specified in detail 30-degree lateral position (avoid 90-degree); head-of-bed ≤30 degrees, balanced against aspiration and VAP risk Not addressed Unstable Micromovements are formal good patients practice; retry full turning 8-hourly Mobilisation "Avoid excessive bed rest; Now supported by meta-analysis — early optimise function" staged mobilisation significantly reduces pressure injuries (RR 0.75)
Prophylactic Not recommended Multilayered soft silicone foam on dressings sacrum and heels suggested for high-risk patients Skin Visual inspection of bony Extended to scalp and under hair; SEM assessment prominences and skin temperature measurement added, especially valuable in darker skin tones where Stage 1 and DTPI are missed Technology Not addressed Wearable movement sensors conditionally suggested as an adjunct — never a replacement for clinical judgement Adjunctive No good evidence they improve Unchanged — NPWT, hyperbaric oxygen, therapies healing laser, ultrasound still not supported for routine use EXAM ONE-LINERS
"Pressure injury" is preferred to "pressure ulcer" — not all are open ulcers.
Four forces: pressure, shear, friction, moisture.
Shear occurs when the head of the bed is elevated and the torso slides down onto the sacrum.
Damage below the ulcer is larger than the visible ulcer.
Stage 1 = non-blanchable erythema, intact skin, persisting beyond 30 minutes.
Stage 2 = partial thickness — blister, abrasion or shallow ulcer.
Stage 3 = full thickness through fat, down to but not through fascia — crater with undermining.
Stage 4 = through deep fascia, bone visible — sinus tracts, osteomyelitis.
Unstageable = base obscured by eschar; DTPI = intact skin, deep purple/ maroon or haemorrhagic blister.
Device-related injuries ARE staged; mucosal injuries are NOT.
Never reverse-stage — use the PUSH tool (size, exudate, tissue type).
>90% occur in the lower body: sacrum/coccyx, ischial tuberosity, greater trochanter (plus heels).
Risk tools: Norton, Braden, Waterlow — on admission and regularly.
Advanced age is NOT an independent risk factor.
Nutrition target: 30–35 kcal/kg, protein 1–1.5 g/kg, fluid 1 mL/kcal.
Turn 2-hourly on a regular mattress, 4-hourly on a pressure-reducing mattress (now individualised — 2 or 3 hourly both acceptable).
30-degree lateral position; head-of-bed ≤30 degrees.
Increasing pain is the best predictor of chronic wound infection (LR 11–20) — classic signs and odour are unhelpful.
Levine technique = swab rotated over 1 × 1 cm for 5 seconds.
Systemic antibiotics only for bacteraemia, sepsis, osteomyelitis or cellulitis — not for routine Stage 3 ulcers.
Managing underlying causes beats any dressing — no single dressing is superior.
Not all pressure injuries are avoidable, especially at the end of life — but the prevention protocol must be in place first.
F I N A L R E V I S I O N S H E E T
Cross-Module Numbers Worth Memorising
Number What it belongs to
1/3 · 1/2 · 1 in 5 Community elders falling yearly · nursing-home residents falling yearly · falls causing serious injury 11.6% Fall prevalence in Indian adults ≥60 years (LASI wave 1)
<0.6 m/sec Abnormal gait speed; each 0.1 m/sec drop = 7% rise in fall risk >12 seconds Timed Up and Go cut-off for high fall risk (10 seconds proposed in 2025) <24 / 28 Tinetti POMA score indicating fall risk 0–56 · 0–12 Berg Balance Scale range · SPPB range ≥45 · ≥2 · ≥5 Morse Fall Scale high risk · STRATIFY at risk · Hendrich II high risk >20 mmHg Systolic drop defining orthostatic hypotension 24% · 34% · 19% Fall reduction: balance/functional exercise · multiple exercise types · Tai chi 14 classes STOPPFall fall-risk-increasing drug classes 3% Proportion of elderly hip fractures that are pathological 56 · 28 · 12 · 5 (%) One year after hip fracture: fall again · repeated falls · new fracture · opposite hip fracture 33% · 77% · 25% Zoledronic acid: clinical · vertebral · peripheral fracture reduction NNT 200 Oral bisphosphonate, to prevent one hip fracture RR 0.82 Hip protectors in nursing/residential care (no benefit in community)
≥50 hours Minimum duration of a structured progressive exercise programme >90% Pressure ulcers occurring in the lower body 30–35 kcal/kg · 1–1.5 g/kg · Energy · protein · fluid targets in the immobile patient 1 mL/kcal 2-hourly / 4-hourly Repositioning: regular mattress / pressure-reducing mattress (now 2 or 3 hourly, individualised)
30 degrees Lateral tilt position and maximum head-of-bed elevation LR 11–20 Increasing pain as a predictor of chronic wound infection 1 × 1 cm, 5 seconds Levine technique for quantitative wound swab 7.8% · 24.3% · 42.8% Indian tertiary hospital: overall pressure ulcer prevalence · ICU prevalence · proportion that are Grade III The four sentences that carry the most marks in this module.
Falls are multifactorial — an acute trigger acting on accumulated chronic impairments; medications are the most modifiable factor.
Progressive balance and functional exercise has the strongest evidence of any fall-prevention intervention; technology and scoring tools are adjuncts.
A fragility fracture requires both a fall and fragile bone — and the effectiveness of fracture prevention increases with advancing age.
In pressure injuries, correcting the underlying contributing factors matters more than the choice of dressing or any adjunctive therapy.
How was your recall?
Rating marks the question complete. “Need another pass” also adds it to your bookmarks.
References
- PAPERS-2-3-4_COMBINED.pdf — page 1267
- GeriQBank source PDF — p. 1267
Spotted an error or something out of date?Report a problem with this page